老外中肯的魔方评测（ 2~5阶）

tonylmd

以下内容来自www.speedsolving.com hardware area置顶贴
Comparisions Between Cubes
Thanks to Lofty for the idea; hopefully this will reduce clutter.
Blank entries indicate I have not used the cube and/or don't have enough info on them.
~
Rubik's Cube
Pros:Widely available, cheap, reacts well to silicone lubricant.
Cons:Needs to be broken in, not good for cutting corners.
Notes:After breaking in, becomes very loose (sometimes looser than DIYs can be made)
~
Rubik's 25th Anniversary Cube
Pros:Reacts very well to silicone lubricant, turns easily after breaking in.
Cons:Needs to be broken in, not amazing for cutting corners.
Notes:After breaking in, becomes very loose (sometimes looser than DIYs can be made)
~
Rubik's DIY
Pros:Cuts corners well, turns easily.
Cons:Comparatively expensive, high shipping costs, center caps fall out easily.
~
Chinese DIYs(cube4you, 9spuzzles)
Pros:Cuts corners well, turns easily, indentations in center caps cause them to fall out less frequently.
Cons:High shipping costs, performance varies between type and cube color.
Notes:Comes in three different types: (a), (b), and (c). Some cubes only available in certain types. Many colors to choose from. Whiteand green cubes turn best, as well as some transparent cubes (WARNING: transparent cubes are NOT competition-legal)
~
Edison Cube
Pros:Cuts corners well, adjustable centers, turns easily
Cons:Only available in Korea (essentially).
~
Famwealth Magic Cube
Pros:No springs = higher turning speed.
Cons:Does not turn well, cannot cut corners.
~
~
Rubik's Revenge (pre-retooling)
Pros:Turns smoothly, cuts corners well, sides fairly balanced, reacts well to lube.
Cons:Needs to be broken in to have the 'pros', pieces may break easily, broken-in cubes are very loose.
~
Rubik's Revenge (retooled)
Pros:Turns smoothly, cuts corners reasonably well, very little breaking in time, sides fairly balanced, reacts well to lube.
Cons:Quality varies from cube to cube.
~
Studio 4x4x4 See Rubik's Revenge.
~
Eastsheen 4x4x4
Pros:Can be used for speedcubing out of the box, requires no lubing or sanding.
Cons:Prone to lock-ups, gradually becomes worse over time.
Notes:6cm in each dimension; smaller than the other 4x4x4 cubes. Purple replaces orange by default.
~
~
Rubik's Professor
Pros:Available.
Cons:Pieces may break; requires breaking in, may require sanding, outer layers don't turn as well as inner layers.
Notes:Can be broken in into an extremely nice cube, which is very comparable with Olympic Cubes and the Mefferts cubes.
~
Studio 5x5x5 See Rubik's 5x5x5.
Mefferts 5x5x5(Limited Edition)
Pros:Outer layers and inner layers turn equally well, adjustable + spring-loaded core.
Cons:Relatively expensive, odd color scheme (red vs. white), tiles fall off easily, LIMITED QUANTITY.
~
Mefferts 5x5x5(Collector's Special)
Pros:Outer layers and inner layers turn equally well, adjustable + spring-loaded core.
Cons:Relatively expensive, stickers need almost immediate replacement, tensions need to be very fine-tuned or risk wing pops, LIMITEDQUANTITY.
~
Eastsheen 5x5x5
Pros:Can be used for speedcubing out of the box, requires no lubing or sanding.
Cons:Becomes looser over time, becomes more prone to pops over time.
Notes:6cm in each dimension, much significantly smaller than other 5x5x5's, same size as Eastsheen 4x4x4. Purple replaces orange by default.
~
~
Eastsheen 2x2x2
Pros:Can be used for speedcubing out of the box, does not require lubing, improves over time, larger than other 2x2x2 cubes.
Cons:Cannot cut corners at first, possible after breaking in.
Notes:5 cm in each dimension. Purple replaces orange by default.
~
Rubik's Mini Cube / Junior
Pros:Availability.
Cons:Pieces break relatively easily, hard to turn (even after lubing), falls apart often.
Notes:Very difficult to reassemble.
~
Rubik's Ice Cube
Pros:Looks neat, slightly smoother than the Rubik's Mini.
Cons:Pieces break relatively easily, falls apart often.
Notes:WARNING: this cube is NOT competition-legal.
~
~
~
原帖及更多讨论
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1665

[ 本帖最后由 tonylmd 于 2009-2-9 09:57 编辑 ]

tonylmd

REVISED:i have lubed and have done a fast adjustment on both cubes... and here are their more accurate properties (they are both white btw)
-OLD- TYPE A:
- about twice as resistive as a type d (the force it takes to turn) this is no great impairment
- smoother (no clicking) and easier to do a single double turn (one swift 180' on a face)
- heavier and feels a little more sturdy
- not as noisy
- more easily cuts cornersTYPE D:- when fully tightened is incredibly loose (more then a well tuned a me thinks)
- least resistance (lightning fast)- not as smooth, it clicks at every quarter turn
- less likely to pop AT LOW RESISTANCE
- lightweight
- noisier
DIRECT COMPARISON:while the type d is less likely to pop at low resistance (if a were at same resistance) i believe that when properly tuned the type a (at a higher resistance) actually feels sturdier and less likely to pop and an all around smoother weightier feel; when you are cutting a corner it also doesn't feel like you are about to compromise the hull integrity of the type a, the thing is thatthe type d will feel like its about to go, but will go farther than the type a before it actually pops (i feel the d sticks more as well.) one can adjust the type a much more to personal preference i.e. turning up resistance, although if your goal is to just get the least resistance possible that is the least likely to pop AT THAT RESISTANCE i would go with the type d; but in my opinion the type a just feels more secure in your hand and much smoother to turn, that is to say less variation in resistance. its up to personal preference but both are miles ahead of a month worked on BEATEN IN store bought cube every inch lubed with silicone, MUCH less variation of resistance on faces and lightning fast comparatively. plus you can do neat things with a diy like cut corners like crazy, adjust tension, things you would have never dreamed of doing on a store bought cube.
it should be noted that the cubes may change character over time and that given a proper tuning each of their properties could improve, if anything changes over the course of a couple of months and i decide to give them a better tune i may update the post.
*update*well i find myself using the type d more and more, it is my main cube, it just feels right when you treat it well, the steadier your hand the less likely it will lock up (not at all), i first saw the 'clicking' as an impairment and it actually results in more accurate turns, i have more fun with the type d; i guess it really is the all around better cube.
~
~
原帖地址及更多讨论
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3800

[ 本帖最后由 tonylmd 于 2009-2-9 09:50 编辑 ]

△×○□

拿出电子辞典来......

wjfstam

…………没中文看着累阿

alabing11

看来对国产评价不错嘛，可惜个体差别比较大，对他们来说运输贵些。

汪小光

对比从立方体
谢谢，以高尚的思想;希望这将减少杂波。
空白项目说明我还没有使用的立方体和/或没有足够的信息对他们。
〜
魔方
优点：广泛使用，价格低廉，反应良好硅润滑剂。
缺点：需要用来被打破的，而不是良好的偷工减料。
注：在突破中，变得非常松散（有时松散比DIYs可）
〜
魔术25周年立方
优点：反应非常好，以有机硅润滑剂，打开后很容易打破英寸
缺点：需要用来被打破的，而不是惊人偷工减料。
注：在突破中，变得非常松散（有时松散比DIYs可）
〜
魔方的自助
优点：降低弯道很好，原来很容易。
缺点：相对昂贵，运输费用高，中心帽破脸容易。
〜
中国DIYs （ cube4you ， 9spuzzles ）
优点：降低弯道很好，原来很容易，凹入中心帽导致他们失去较少。
缺点：高运费，业绩之间的类型和立方体的颜色。
注：有三种不同类型： （一） ， （ b ）和（ c ）项。一些立方体只适用于某些类型。许多颜色可供选择。 Whiteand绿色立方体反过来最佳，也有一些透明的立方体（警告：透明立方体是不是竞争法律）
〜
爱迪生立方
优点：降低弯道以及可调中心，原来很容易
缺点：只在韩国（基本上） 。
〜
Famwealth魔方
优点：无弹簧=更高的转弯速度。
缺点：不转好，不能偷工减料。
〜
〜
魔方的报复（前重组）
优点：打开顺利，削减弯道很好，双方相当均衡，反应良好润滑油。
缺点：需要打破在有'利弊' ，只可轻易打破，破碎的冰块都非常宽松。
〜
魔方的报复（重组）
优点：打开顺利，削减弯道相当不错，很少打破时间，双方相当均衡，反应良好润滑油。
缺点：质量不同立方体，以立方体。
〜
工作室4x4x4见魔方的报复。
〜
Eastsheen 4x4x4
优点：可用于speedcubing开箱，无需履冰或打磨。
缺点：易拘留所，逐渐恶化一段时间。
注：六厘米在每一个层面;小于其他4x4x4立方体。橙色紫色取代默认。
〜
〜
鲁比克教授
优点：可用。
缺点：作品可能会打破;需要打破的，可能需要打磨，外层不反过来以及内层。
注：可以打破在进入一个非常好的魔方，这是非常媲美奥运立方体和Mefferts立方体。
〜
工作室5x5x5见魔方的5x5x5 。
Mefferts 5x5x5 （限量版）
优点：外层与内层反过来同样，可调+弹簧核心。
缺点：相对昂贵，奇怪的配色方案（红色与白色） ，瓦片掉下来容易，数量有限。
〜
Mefferts 5x5x5 （珍藏特别）
优点：外层与内层反过来同样，可调+弹簧核心。
缺点：相对昂贵，贴纸几乎需要立即更换，紧张需要非常微调或风险永持久性有机污染物， LIMITEDQUANTITY 。
〜
Eastsheen 5x5x5
优点：可用于speedcubing开箱，无需履冰或打磨。
缺点：成为松散随着时间的推移，变得更容易持久性有机污染物随着时间的推移。
注：六厘米在每一个层面，但明显小于其他5x5x5的，大小相同Eastsheen 4x4x4 。橙色紫色取代默认。
〜
〜
Eastsheen 2x2x2
优点：可用于speedcubing开箱，并不需要履冰，改善随着时间的推移，大于其他2x2x2立方体。
缺点：无法偷工减料，首先可能打破英寸
注：五厘米在每个层面。橙色紫色取代默认。
〜
魔方的迷你立方/初级
优点：可用性。
缺点：作品打破相对容易，很难打开（即使在履冰） ，分崩离析往往。
注：重新很难。
〜
魔方的冰块
优点：看起来整齐，稍平滑比魔方的迷你。
缺点：作品打破相对容易，往往分崩离析。
注：警告：这是不是竞争立方体法律。
〜
cube4you A和D型建材比较
修订：我lubed并做了快速的调整都立方体...这里是他们更准确的财产（他们都是白色btw ）
，旧型答：
-两倍左右电阻作为D型（联黎部队需要打开） ，这是没有太大的障碍
-平滑（无点击） ，更容易做一个单一的双重反过来（ 1迅速180 '的脸）
-重，感觉多一点坚固
-没有噪音
-更容易地削减cornersTYPE D组： -完全收紧时，令人难以置信松散（更多然后一个调谐1我认为）
-至少有阻力（快如闪电） -不顺利，它在每个季度的点击打开
-不太可能弹出在低电阻
-轻量级
-噪音
直接比较： D型，而不太可能流行低电阻（如果一个人在同一电阻）我相信，当适当调校的输入（在更高阻力）实际上感觉坚固和不太可能流行和各地平滑重感觉;当您切割的一个角落，也不会觉得您要妥协船体完整的A型，关键是thatthe D型会感觉其约去，但会走得更远比输入实际收到的持久性有机污染物（我觉得更多的D棍棒以及。 ）一个可以调整输入一个更大的努力，即把个人喜好反抗，但如果您的目标是刚刚获得的阻力可能是最有可能弹出在电阻我会去的D型，但在我看来，公正的类型感觉更安全的在你的手和顺利得多打开，也就是说不到变异性。其行动的个人喜好，但两者都是英里提前一个月的工作殴打商店购买的每一寸lubed立方体硅胶，更不用说变化和面临的阻力就比较快如闪电。加上你可以做一个干净的东西一样偷工减料建材像疯了似的，调整紧张，你将做梦也没有想到这样的一家商店买了立方体。
应当指出的是，该立方体可能改变性质随着时间的推移，并给予适当的调整各自的特性可以改善，如果任何变化的过程中一两个月，我决定给他们一个更好的调整我可以更新后。
*更新*以及我发现自己使用的D型越来越多，这是我的主要立方体，我就觉得这是正确对待它时，那么，稳定你的手的可能性就越小将锁定（不是所有） ，我第一次看到了'点击'作为损害和实际的结果更准确的结果，我更有趣的D型;我猜这确实是更好的立方体各地。
〜
技术有限。。上网在线翻译的，翻译水平拙劣，有些词好像是照翻的……

不过文章很好！支持下

[ 本帖最后由 汪小光 于 2009-2-9 10:06 编辑 ]

happyangel888

看中文翻译更晕!!!

lamianbu

那是机器翻译的，google？

魔方世家008

有谁能给他换成英文的啊？

魔鱼儿

呵呵,顶下小光,是用翻译软件翻译的吗,