- 最后登录
- 2023-8-16
- 在线时间
- 3007 小时
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 注册时间
- 2007-12-3
- 积分
- 3923
- 帖子
- 2556
- 精华
- 6
- UID
- 15558
- 性别
- 保密
- WCA ID
- 2008CHEN27
- 兴趣爱好
- 理论
- 积分
- 3923
- 帖子
- 2556
- 精华
- 6
- UID
- 15558
- 性别
- 保密
- WCA ID
- 2008CHEN27
- 兴趣爱好
- 理论
|
转一段。。
Usually we print a lot of scramble papers an then, when comes to scamble, pick up one randomly and use it for that round/group so there is no way to know which scramble sheet will be in final, semi, etc.
BUT, even if a delegate would choose scramble for each group there won't be way to know if you are getting a lucky scramble from that solves. The delegate should have to scramble all the cubes, even the one he's suppose to compete with, and then decide. Of course THIS is unfair.
Even from 20 moves 2x2 scramble you can get 4 moves solve.
The program by WCA was made to make random scrambles. So we click on the "Scramble" button, print them, then randomly pick them up when comes to scramble. The scramble are read in the moment all the competitors are already in the waiting area, waiting for the cubes. Probably even the delegate. What should the scramble guy do? Go ask to the delegate to check the scramble, of his group, cuz they're too easy? No way.
Lucky scrambles are the part of the game, the computer generates them. I don't see why a delegate should CHECK the scrambles, the computer already checked them when generated.
If the computer generated scrambles are the problem, invent a generator with no lucky scrambles. |
|