- 最后登录
- 2018-9-11
- 在线时间
- 137 小时
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 注册时间
- 2010-10-5
- 积分
- 190
- 帖子
- 74
- 精华
- 0
- UID
- 1275685
- 性别
- 保密
 
- 积分
- 190
- 帖子
- 74
- 精华
- 0
- UID
- 1275685
- 性别
- 保密
|
I cannot write my thoughts with google translate. They come out funny so I apologize for the English and hope someone will translate for me (ahem-Tony, please)
i am first and foremost a collector of puzzles. I would be a hypocrite to say I had no copy cubes. I have hundreds if not thousands of them. (yell if you will. I don't care-I've been yelled at by many before )
Oskar is indeed upset about this new development, but what can he do? Meffert's is upset and is attempting to do something.
There are so many cubes that have no patent, or have an expired patent. To me these are free game. an example of which is the basic cube. Yes, Rubik's has a copyright on the black body BOY color scheme, but the cube itself and the mechanism is free game. Many of Meffert's older puzzles fall under this category. Why do you think nothing is heard of copied megaminxes or pyraminxes. They have reached their 'expiry date'.
The gear cube is patented and awaiting more patents. For this particular puzzle, I find it reprehensible that the companies would copy it. And yes, I have a copy. Just by looking at it, you can tell the quality is poor. It appears to be molded from an original without any thoughts to retooling and tolerances. The pieces don't fit snuggly within each other, and they turn horribly. Lock ups and pops are not uncommon. If you waste your money on this US$8 piece of junk be aware that you are getting junk. In the end it is cheaper to purchase the original from Meffert's if you want to play with it.
As for Tony Fisher's cubes, he is just a simple working man. He cannot afford the high cost of patents. He has respectfully asked people not to copy certain puzzles of his. http://tonyfisherpuzzles.net/F%20Copying%20my%20puzzles.html I found it very interesting that Tony's cubes started showing up in ebay shops and online stores shortly after he opened his webpage. Those who have been copying his ideas are not breaking any legal laws, but tread a very fine line morally. Meffert's is attempting to get some small amount of Money for Tony and other builders who have been copied by these moral-less companies. So yes, he is purchasing from them, but he isn't making money on the sales. The real fact is he has purchased many and taken a loss.
I know some may say that these are free game and China and the Western countries have different values, morals, and standards (I hear it from my students all the time) But there are some universal truths that cross cultures: do not murder, do not disrespect your parents, do not STEAL. This is what these copy companies are doing. It's pure and simple theft. And I guess you could say they are disrespecting the parents (the original builders who had the creativity of thought to change the standard into something amazing) And indeed they are murdering as well. They are murdering the desire to build new designs, they are murdering the production of new puzzles.
My two cents worth. take it as you will. We have discussed this to death on twisty puzzles and have come to no clear conclusions. It would be nice if you all could here. But from the looks of things, you stand here as we do there. |
|