请问由于裁判没有遮挡会影响官方对盲拧成绩的认可么？

robbie

老瓦破世界记录的时候
前面十多秒裁判似乎入神了
忘记了用挡板遮挡
官方的规则上有对这种情况处理方式的说明么？
因为看到国外论坛上有对这一事件的质疑
希望占星可以解释一下
谢谢

These records are amazing, I wish I had been at this competition. Just one little problem:

I greatly respect Haiyan Zhuang, I am not trying to offend him in any way. I think this world record is simply astounding. However, the WCA regulations state: 'During the full solve the judge must keep a sheet of paper or a similar object between the competitor's face and the puzzle, unless the puzzle is in a position where peeking at the puzzle is not possible.' (Rule B4c)

His judge had no item in between his face and the puzzle for the first 13 seconds of the solving portion. He most likely couldn't be peeking, and was in a position where it was impossible for him to see the puzzle. I am almost certain that this record is valid, I just thought I should bring this up. I think the WCA Board should be sure that this record is legal. Was it possible for him to have been peeking during the execution? If it was, the result is DNF.

http://www.speedsolving.com/foru ... ?t=14800&page=5

哈哈_china

有没有过后补裁的规定？？根据录像裁定有没有效？

r_517

LZ很幸运。。。没受到电缆破坏的影响。。。我们这边今天晚上根本没法上国外的网站。。。

xiaoshudian

有人怀疑是正常的心里，但成绩应该按裁判裁定的计算。有效。

dyer

这个现在我也不好说，要看ron他们怎么判，只能说我觉得不大可能成绩判无效，毕竟裁判后来还是遮挡了，要是全程无遮挡就麻烦了。

rickymohk

老瓦太快了,裁判沒來得及拿擋板老瓦就完成了

风流沙驼

好事多磨，希望一切顺利，昨天在这些论坛我也看到了同样的声音

robbie

看来规则里是没有这方面的补充规定
而且我觉得非官方的录像也不可能作为重新裁定的依据吧
看来以后盲拧的裁判要更加留心啊
如果由于裁判的失误错失了好成绩甚至世界纪录就太可惜了

r_517

11f) The main judge and WCA delegate must not support their decisions with video or photograph analysis.

但是，也的确出现过有人因为录像中被人看出作弊而被取消成绩或不承认成绩的。。。那个人也说了自己很尊重老瓦，但毕竟这的确是一个问题……

飞扬

这个真是很严重的问题啊
不过成绩应该都报上去了